McDonaldization Essay -- essays research papers

peck At Work CourseworkQuestion To what extent do you consider this sentiment of the McDonaldization of society disturbing, expected or inevitable, for employees in the twentifirst century. Also the possible consequences for theories of adult male motivation and whether the ideal applies equally to all jobs.In this paper I result be analysing the effects McDonaldization has on society and the employees of the twentifirst century. I will be discussing whether McDonaldization is to be expected, accepted, rejected or is inevitable. I will too be arguing that McDonaldization does effect employee motivation, and how it fits in the numerous theories on motivation. McDonaldization as defined by George Ritzer is the process by which the principles of the fast-food restaurant are glide path to dominate more and more sectors of society. This concept originally stems from the concept of bureaucracy, which was a case of organisational structure that aimed to rationalise and standardise its products and services and the processes it took to mother them. McDonaldization differs somewhat from bureaucracy as it concerns itself with its five main points Efficiency, Calculatability, Predictability and Control. For the emphasis to be on these points it has an effect on employees jobs. Often it involves the de-skilling of the employees, under McDonaldization employees do not need a wide range of skills, In occurrence just to be productive they only need to know how to discern a single task. This has numerous benefits for the organisation, primarily it cuts down on cookery costs as it does not cost much to train for base skilled jobs, and as these jobs are so low skilled employees good deal be paid minimum wage. It to a fault leaves employees with little bargaining causation as staff can be replaced so easily. Jobs often reverse standardised and continually repetitive and leave room for little or free thinking or initiative to be employed. Staff are often replaced or governed by technological changes. However it is argued that the effects McDonaldization has on employees depends on the more variables surrounding your job i.e. public or private, lively collar (professional) or white collar (menial) jobs or simply the type of industry retail, service or tertiary. Public sector jobs head for the hills to be as less affected by McDonaldization than pr... ...n, Supervision, Working Conditions, Relationships, Salary, Status and Security. As I outlined in previous paragraphs that McDonaldization has a negative dissemble on all these things. Herzbergs model also names motivators as being achievement, recognition, interest in tasks, responsibility and advancement. McDonaldization by design makes it more awkward to make pornographic achievements and even harder to be recognised for them. With the standardisation of many jobs interest in the tasks are unlikely to play a big part in motivation. Increased responsibility, growth and advancement ha ve also been negatively effected by McDonaldization and opportunities for either of these motivators is become bleak.Overall iodine can see that the effects McDonaldization have had on society and its employees tend to be negative ones. alone the reason it is so widespread is because colossal organisations rely on it as a means to maximise profit. But is the price too high for the rest of us to bear. It plays as a de-motivator, effects our everyday thinking. ReferencesGeorge Ritzer The McDonaldization Of SocietyAbraham MaslowFredrick HerzbergDr Ellen LangerMullinsBuchanan & Huczynski