Balancing Federal Budget

J bed Owen R horizontalues (in millions of dollars) various(prenominal) Income Taxes Corporate Income Taxes Social Insurance and Retirement Receipts Excise Taxes some other marrow 2011 Federal Budget 1,091,473 181,085 818,792 72,381 139,735 2,303,466 Your Budget $1,391,473 $187,946 $800,000 $65,256 $159,000 $2,603,675 Difference +$300,000 +$6,861 -$18,792 -$7,125 +$19,265 +$303,166 Expenditures (in millions of dollars) 050 National demurral Total-Spending categories 150-450 500 Education 550 Health 570 Medicare 600 Income Security 650 Social Security Total-Spending categories 700-950 Total 2011 Federal Budget 705,625 257,662 101,233 372,500 485,653 597,352 730,811 352,225 3,603,061 Your Budget $505,644 $200,632 $110,000 $250,500 $479,222 $407,123 $450,351 200,203 2,603,675 Difference -$199,981 -$57,030 +$8,767 -$122,000 -$6,431 -$190,229 -$280,460 -$152,022 -$999,386 I am going to raise the individual income tax which might anger citizenry merely I am lowering the excise t axes which is for gas, etc.I am also breeding corporate income taxes because big franchise companies can afford to give up some of their income to be able to give more elsewhere. I thought lowering the social insurance and retirement receipts was a unassailable idea because there are programs and benefits that are already utilize into this and the limited bullion will be put in areas that do non have extra help and rely just on the bullion inflow. I enlarged the other category because since it incorporates multiple programs, the big increase will be spread across a lot of contrasting programs therefore, to each individual program it will not be a big increase.I lowered the National Defense spending because since we won the contend overseas, we are bringing more and more troops home and even though it is not a gist peace time, we do not have to spend as much as the year before. I actually increased what is spend on education because that is very authorized to our earth and the more educated people there are, the more jobs people will be able to get which in turn federal agency they make more money then they would without education. This means that more money will increase the GDP and make the economy grow.Unfortunately, I had to deoxidise some spending in the health and medicare areas but there are programs and benefits that help these areas so it is not as much as a loss and the plain numbers show. I decreased the social valueive cover because this government spending does not count towards the GDP which means it does nothing for the economy. These people can afford to take a minor apply cut in order for that money to be used in other areas that will help the economy grow. I decreased the income pledge because of the different acts such as The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 which protect these people in said programs.The decrease in both total spending categories are appropriate, again, because they include multiple areas that already have benefits implemented in them. This means that a small decrease in some areas will give a bigger sum of money to be spent in other areas. In conclusion, the areas that need to be changed are the ones that will make the population spend more in our country to increase our GDP and in turn get our economy spine on track. By doing this, we are getting our economy under halt which will lead to it becoming easier to balance the federal budget.