View of the soldier during ww

Do you agree with the view that the British soldiers life in the trenches of the Western summit during the introductory World War was one of incessant horror? Trench conditions varied widely between divergent theatres of war, different sectors within a theatre, and with the time of class and weather. Trench life was until now always one of considerable squalor, with so many hands life history In a very constrained space. Source 7 supports this by saying process fell prey to dysentery and trench fever as a result of filthy conditions and exposure. even so source 8 disagrees where it depicts how the roofs where barely in the trenches for a in brief time, furthermore source 9 continues to support source 8 by saying casualties where low. The trenches all the way were not a nice place to be and their would much nicer places the promenade would of rather been. However Source 9 tells casualties were low simply because men were in trenches. This gives the impression that life i n trenches was not so naughtily after all. It explains how the trenches saved the lives of the troops and clearly were an as effectuate to the soldiers.However from my own fellowship I see the trenches to have scraps of scarred food, empty tins and other(a) waste, the nearby presence of the latrine, the general dirt of living half thermionic vacuum tube and being unable to wash or change for long time or weeks at a time attaind conditions of severe health risk (and that Is not counting the military risks). Vermin Including rats and lice were very numerous disease was gap both by them, and by the maggots and flies that thrived on the nearby stiff of decomposing human and animal corpses.This is back up in source 7 where it illustrates the troops suffered from typhoid caused by lice and were liable o get fungal infection known as trench foot in the frequently wet, slapdash conditions. This supports the view that the British soldiers life in the trenches of the Western Front during the First World War was one of unbroken horror. Troops in the trenches were too subjected to the weather the spend of 1916-1917 in France and Flanders was the coldest in living memory the trenches swamp In the wet, sometimes to waist height, whenever It rained.Men suffered from exposure, frostbite, trench foot (a wasting disease of the flesh caused by the foot being wet and cold, constrained Into tots and puttees, for days on end, that would cripple a man), and many diseases brought on or do worse by living in such a way. This is supported in source 7 where it states the men were in wet, bobbledy conditions. This astonishingly backed up by Source 9 (Argues the trenches were safe, constructed for protection) where it says the mud that exists in our mental depictions of the Front was most common in Flanders. However Source 9 contradicts its self by saying the land tended to debilitate properly.This gives a complete different perspective, only when goes on to explain wh y. The flat coat is due to the trenches passing through many kinds of terrain. This explains the a cause for all different accounts about the lives for the soldiers in the trenches and shows how the vast length of the trench ocellus meant different areas had completely different weather and terrains. Indeed, the Great War, a style coined even before It had begun, was expected to be a relatively short affair and, as with most wars, one of great movement. The First exemplified on the Western Front from autumn 1914 until spring 1918.Source 8 helps to portray this as well where it says the idea that was not stopping in the trenches for long. The sound out idea in this quote implies the fact that this is what the generals wanted to happen but may have not actually happened. Source 8 goes on to say, the result, in the long term, meant that we lived a mean and impoverished sort of world in lousy scratch holes. This shows, due to expectation of continues moving towards the Germans, the trenches were not well made or fortified and therefore not large the men enough protection or comfortable living spaces.This however, is contradicted by Source 9 where it says how casualties were low simply because men were in trenches. And where it likewise quotes the trenches were instructed for protection. Not that there wasnt movement at all on the Western Front during 1914-18 the war began dramatically with sweeping advances by the Germans through Belgium and France heading for Paris. However stalemate and trench warfare soon set in, and the expected war of movement wasnt restored until towards the close of the war, although the line rippled as successes were achieved at a small level.Finally, no overview of trench life piece of tail avoid the aspect that instantly struck visitors to the lines the appalling reek given over off by numerous conflicting sources. Rotting carcasses arrange close to in their thousands. For example, approximately 200,000 men were killed on the Some battlefields, many of which lay in shallow graves. Overflowing latrines would similarly give off a most offensive stench. Men who had not been afforded the luxury of a cleanse in weeks or months would offer the pervading dour of dried sweat.The feet were generally original to give off the worst dour. Trenches would also smell of cresol or chloride of lime, used to stave off the constant threat of disease and infection. To hang on to this the smell of cordite, the lingering dour of poison gas, rotting sandbags, stagnant mud, goat smoke ND cooking food. This is supported by Source 7, describing how the soldiers had to dowry their dugouts and their food with disease ridden rats fattened on a plentiful sum up of rotting corpses.This portrays that the life in trenches was one of unbroken horror. It can be said that the trenches were clearly better than nothing, offering small amounts of protection at the least. However they clearly were not something they looked forward to with its filthy conditions stated in source 7. I feel the main difference between the sources which create the argument, is likely to be that the counts are taken from different locations along the British front line as well the time of the year.As stated previously, the winter of 1916-1917 in France and Flanders was the coldest in living memory, where as other times of the year and different areas were not so bad. Moreover the trenches were a place of hell. AH though they offered protection for the troops, the conditions and living standards were terrible. Therefore, agreeing that the British soldiers life in the trenches of the Western Front during the First World War was one of unbroken horror. Charlie Runoff