Philosophies & Democracy Essay Example for Free

Philosophies Democracy EssayDemocracy and capitalism gave way to concentration of wealth amongst a sm each(prenominal) group of people. Private entrepreneurship got a boost repayable to capitalism. Given this scenario, many private entrepreneurs rose to build their industrial empires. There are many examples, where, the starting signal point of a given care was zero, and it rose to become a leading international byplay enterp swipe house. Increase in business, resulted in exaggerated accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few, and that was the time, when these unused class of rich entrepreneurs, gave a thought to the society, inwhich they have been operating, and which has supported their enterp turn up in its rise. Carnegie Melon, at the beginning of industrial revolution, and chronicle supply, at the end of the twentieth century, are two solid examples of business rise from zero to international giants. Both of them, spent their full life, in amassing wealth, and a s they grew, they started framing incorporate philosophies, which put society at the focus of their activities. While they applied the rule of everything is fair in business, they turned towards society at the fag end of their lives.Corporate philosophies, by and large have nil new to say, except that they work for the society, and they care for their customers. All corporate philosophies are concentrated around these substitution themes, in different words and sentences. Often, it is proved that corporate philosophies are not as sweet as they sound. When it comes to business, these philosophies are sacrificed, partially or fully. Was only genuine software skill responsible for the stupendous rise of short letter Gates and Microsoft? Of course no. There is in fact, considerable shrewdness going intothe rise of Microsoft. In fact, corporate houses, as they grow, turn their attention towards betterment of society, in one or the opposite way. There are numerous examples to prove t his, in the time gap between Carnegie Melon and Bill Gates. However, they are targeted at multiplication of business. An average Ameri erect fully understands the implications of these corporate philosophies, and their implied meanings. For example, when cyber attacks started assuming alarming proportions, Bill Gates ordered a change in their corporate philosophy. It implied change in the approach ofall software development. Now, instead of adding new features to the software, the focus was to be laid on protection of the software, because, Bill Gates argued, In the past, weve made our software and services more compelling for users by adding new features and functionality, and by fashioning our platform richly extensible . . . but all those great features wont matter unless customers trust our software, wrote Gates. So now, when we face a choice between adding features and resolving security issues, we need to choose security. ( trustworthy computing,check bit 2) Some of Microso fts perennial critics claim the initiative is long overdue, and question whether or not Microsoft allow for follow through on its promises, as the company could be forced to bear a decline in the number of new features in its programs and significant new product delays. Some go bring forward in arguing that such a massive security initiative cannot be undertaken without subjecting the Windows operating musical arrangement source code to public domain something the company has fought hard to avoid. Writes an observer, in his opinion. ( Trustworthycomputing, check bit 4) What is true of Microsoft , is perhaps true of other companies also. An average American is well aware of the status of the company, and its capacitor to deliver the promised goods, and is also right in judging the ethical behavior of a company. Conclusively it can be said that despite the tall claims made by the corporate philosophies, the average American of the ins and outs of that firm. References 1) Trustwo rthy computing, Security and privacy deemed Microsofts top priorities, retrieved on 5 May 2009 from http//www. cfif. org/htdocs/freedomline/current/in_our_opinion/fl_trustworthy_computing. htm